REPUBLICANS BACKTRACK ON MEDICAID CUTS
Republican lawmakers are showing unprecedented hesitation about cutting Medicaid, despite previous party positions. House Speaker Mike Johnson, who represents Louisiana where 60% of births are financed through Medicaid, has ruled out major cuts to the program. Similarly, Rep. David Valadao from California, where 6 out of 10 residents use Medicaid, and Sen. Lisa Murkowski from Alaska, where one-third of the population relies on Medicaid, have joined the defense.
This resistance emerges as Republicans consider options to finance $4.5 trillion in tax cuts, potentially by reducing Medicaid funding by as much as $880 billion over the next decade. The shifting stance highlights the growing recognition of Medicaid’s importance to constituents across party lines.
GROWING PRESSURE FROM STATE REPUBLICANS
State-level Republican leadership is also pushing back against potential cuts. More than a dozen Minnesota GOP lawmakers recently warned the president that “too deep of a cut is unmanageable.” Republican Nevada Governor Joe Lombardo stated in a congressional letter that “proposed reductions would put lives at risk,” while Alaska’s Republican Senate Majority Leader Cathy Giessel expressed “huge concerns.”
This resistance reflects the reality that states would struggle to manage healthcare costs if federal funding decreases. In some states, the federal government currently covers over 80% of Medicaid expenses.
MEDICAID’S EXPANDING POPULARITY
A January poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research found that 55% of Americans believe the government spends too little on Medicaid. The program now serves approximately 80 million poor and disabled Americans, including millions of children, at an annual cost of $880 billion.
“It’s now a very popular program that touches a very broad cross-section of American society,” explained Drew Altman, president of health care research firm KFF. “Roughly half of the American people say that they or a family member have at one time been served by the program.”
ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES UNDER CONSIDERATION
While major structural changes appear off the table, Republicans are still considering other modifications to achieve savings. Work requirements, which could save around $109 billion over the next decade, have substantial support within the GOP, with some Republican-led states already implementing them.
Other potential changes include benefit or coverage reductions and eliminating provider taxes that states use to finance Medicaid. However, President Trump recently made his position clear, stating: “We’re not going to touch it.”
DEMOCRATIC RESPONSE AND FUTURE OUTLOOK
Democrats warn that any reductions could have serious consequences. The Democratic super PAC House Majority Forward is launching a multi-million-dollar TV ad campaign across 20 congressional districts, cautioning that Medicaid cuts could close hospitals and leave millions without coverage.
Critics like Michael Cannon, health studies director at the libertarian Cato Institute, believe Medicaid needs reform due to its significant contribution to the federal budget and national debt. However, he notes that current Republican proposals are primarily focused on financing tax cuts rather than comprehensive health reform.
As the deadline to avoid a partial government shutdown approaches, the debate over Medicaid’s future highlights the complex intersection of healthcare policy, budget priorities, and constituent needs that lawmakers must navigate.
Discover the latest GovHealth news updates with a single click. Follow DistilINFO GovHealth and stay ahead with updates. Join our community today!
