Understanding State Directed Payments: A Powerful Tool
State Directed Payments (SDPs) have revolutionized how additional funding reaches Medicaid providers. Unlike traditional models, these payments allow states to collaborate with managed care organizations (MCOs) and providers, creating financial incentives that drive improved patient care, reduced healthcare disparities, and enhanced system efficiency.
SDPs help states address the unique needs of their Medicaid populations, but they come with significant challenges. Providers and MCOs must navigate complex regulations, ensure transparent fund allocation, measure outcomes effectively, and manage the substantial administrative burden required to maintain compliance with federal guidelines.
What Are State Directed Payments?
State Directed Payments are CMS-authorized financial arrangements that enable state Medicaid programs to instruct MCOs to make specific provider payments under certain conditions. Introduced through the 2016 Medicaid Managed Care Final Rule, these payments are linked to quality improvement, access to care, and other state-defined priorities.
By improving Medicaid reimbursement rates—traditionally lower than Medicare and commercial payers—SDPs enhance the financial viability of providers serving this population and increase long-term care access for beneficiaries. These targeted resources help reduce care disparities and improve overall health outcomes across communities.
Types of State Directed Payments
States can design SDP programs based on local needs, including:
Value-Based Payments (VBPs): Rewards providers for delivering high-quality, cost-effective care through performance-based incentives.
Minimum or Maximum Fee Schedules: Mandates specific payment levels for covered services to ensure adequate provider compensation.
Uniform Rate Increases: Standardizes payment increases across provider types, fostering reimbursement consistency. According to MACPAC, these comprised 67% of total SDP spending between February 2023 and August 2024.
Quality Incentive Payments: Links payments to metrics like patient satisfaction, reduced readmissions, or improved chronic disease management.
States must submit detailed “Preprint” forms to CMS at least 90 days before implementation, with providers using these documents to estimate their payment share for financial planning.
What Doesn’t Qualify as a State Directed Payment?
Not all provider payment requirements qualify as SDPs. According to CMCS’s 2017 Informational Bulletin, the following scenarios aren’t considered state directed payments:
- General requirements for MCOs to increase provider reimbursement without mandating specific methodologies or amounts
- General requirements for MCOs to implement value-based purchasing when states don’t mandate specific payment methodologies
The 2024 CMS Final Rule: Key Changes
CMS’s April 2024 update to Medicaid Managed Care regulations brought significant changes to SDP implementation:
Expanded Provider Eligibility: Removed restrictions limiting SDPs to network providers only, reducing administrative burden.
Payment Rate Limit: Established Average Commercial Rate (ACR) as the regulatory ceiling for hospital, nursing, and professional services.
Financing Compliance: Requires providers to attest they don’t participate in hold harmless arrangements for healthcare-related taxes (enforcement begins January 2028).
Enhanced Evaluation Requirements: Mandates evaluation plans for SDPs exceeding 1.5% of managed care capitation payments, with reports due every three years.
Post-Payment Reconciliation Ban: Prohibits post-payment reconciliation for fee schedule-based SDPs.
Approval Exemption: Exempts states from prior approval when adopting minimum-fee schedules using 100% of published Medicare rates.
Hospital Implementation Challenges
Hospitals face numerous operational challenges when managing SDPs:
Complex Billing and Coding: Requires precise tracking and reporting to ensure correct payment application.
Quality Metric Tracking: Necessitates robust systems for data collection and reporting.
Regulatory Compliance: Demands staying current with evolving state and federal requirements.
MCO Coordination: Requires effective communication to avoid payment discrepancies.
Data Management: Calls for integrated clinical, financial, and operational systems.
Staff Training: Involves investment in education about SDP requirements and processes.
Reimbursement Disputes: May require significant administrative effort to resolve payment issues.
Operational Impacts: Can affect staffing, care delivery models, and service offerings.
Effectiveness Evaluation: Requires ongoing data analysis to assess achievement of program goals.
Medicaid Redetermination Impact
The redetermination process significantly affects SDP effectiveness by creating enrollment fluctuations. These changes can:
- Reduce funds allocated to providers as beneficiary numbers decrease
- Diminish the effectiveness of health improvement efforts due to unstable patient populations
- Interrupt care continuity, undermining quality improvement and disparity reduction goals
Notable SDP Examples
North Carolina Debt Relief Program: Requires hospitals to forgive eligible Medicaid enrollee medical debt dating back to 2014 and implement policies to prevent future debt accumulation.
California Maternity Supplemental Payment: Provides lump-sum payments to cover facility and physician costs when Medicaid members give birth.
California Private Hospital Program: Directs over $7 billion in uniform increases for inpatient and outpatient services at private hospitals for 2024.
Texas Behavioral Health Program: Increases payments to mental health centers to enhance access, improve coordination, and support care transitions.
Georgia Physician Program: Provides payments to physicians affiliated with governmental teaching hospitals, reimbursing up to commercial equivalent rates.
Discover the latest GovHealth news updates with a single click. Follow DistilINFO GovHealth and stay ahead with updates. Join our community today!
